How Motherhood Is Changing the Seattle City Council

Two Seattle City Council members are fighting for family-friendly policies
| FROM THE PRINT EDITION |
 
 
WORKING MOMS: Seattle City Council members (and expectant mothers) Teresa Mosqueda (left) and Lorena González (right)

This article appears in print in the November 2019 issue. Click here to subscribe.

Editor’s Note: Council member Teresa Mosqueda gave birth on October 9, 2019.

Here is something that shouldn’t be blazing trails but is: By January, two members of the Seattle City Council, Lorena González and Teresa Mosqueda, will be new mothers. It will be the first time in Seattle’s history that any council member—much less two—has given birth while in office.

It might seem unfair to single out González and Mosqueda as extraordinary—after all, plenty of men have served on the council (and as mayor) while their kids were young. But being a new mom in any profession—much less the fishbowl of elected office—is still exceedingly rare, even in a city like Seattle, which touts its inclusiveness and progressive values. In the 150 years since Seattle’s first city council formed in 1869, there have been just 28 female council members, nearly half of them in this century and none of them new moms.

Mosqueda is due first, in October. She says the strangest comments she’s heard so far are from people remarking on her body—along the lines of “Are you sure you aren’t having twins?”—followed by people asking, “How are you going to do your job?”

Prior to serving on the council, Mosqueda lobbied for paid family leave and other equitable workplace policies as the political and strategic campaign director for the Washington State Labor Council. She says that by taking off the full three months to which she’s entitled under state law—and leaving her office in the hands of her “high-quality, highly skilled team of women”—she hopes to set an example for other women that it’s normal and important for new parents to take time off to bond with their babies.

“I want to prove to people that you can both be a new mom and the high-functioning professional that people have either elected... or hired you to [be],” Mosqueda says. “I think it’s really important to show that [it] is possible to do both.”

González, who is due in January, says she’s heard the same questions about whether she can continue to do her job with a baby. She calls such questions “a testament to the fact that we still have a ways to go, particularly within politics, toward accepting not just motherhood, but the actual existence of women being pregnant while in public office.” In 2014, then state legislator Jessyn Farrell gave birth to a child (her third) while representing the 46th Legislative District in the state house; until Farrell, there had not been another female House member with a baby in more than two decades.

Heidi Wills, a former City Council member who ran for council District 6 this year (this issue went to press before the November election), says she made a conscious decision not to have kids while she was on the council, because she worried that evening meetings and other duties would take her away from her family. “I used to joke that I was glad I didn’t get reelected [in 2003] because I was able to have a family,” Wills says.

Of course, there have always been dads on the council, including fathers of young kids. Peter Steinbrueck, who served from 1997 to 2007, had two young sons, who sometimes came with him to council meetings, as did Mike O’Brien, who retired this year after a decade on the council. Rob Johnson, who left the council before the end of his single term, has three young daughters, including twins.

The difference is that men aren’t expected to be the primary caregivers for their children, and no one ever asks them how they’re going to “do it all” once they become fathers. “Oftentimes, you see moms juggling a baby and groceries, and getting in and out of a car, and not a single person will think twice about that or offer to help,” González says. “But when a dad in the workplace is seen holding a child, it’s like, ‘Oh my god, it’s an Emmy Award–winning moment.’”

Johnson, whose wife left her full-time job to become a home-based consultant after the couple realized they would be losing money if they put their kids in day care, says he made a conscious decision early on to leave work every day at 5 p.m. so he could see his kids before they went to bed. “I told [a staffer], if I don’t get out the door at 5, I don’t get to see my kids, and I might as well leave at midnight,” Johnson says.

Although there’s clearly a certain amount of privilege in being able to set those boundaries—as Johnson points out, no one has ever asked him, “How are you able to balance work and family?”—Mosqueda says she appreciates the way Johnson set an example for future parents on the council by adapting his work schedule to fit his family responsibilities, and not the other way around.

Even before they knew they were going to be moms themselves, both Mosqueda and González led efforts, both individually and as a team, to adopt more family-friendly policies both at City Hall and in workplaces across Seattle: requiring employers to give advance notice of schedule changes for hourly food service and retail workers, most of whom are women (making up 71% of frontline food service workers and 53% of retail employees); adding child care to the list of public benefits developers can provide as part of the recently passed Mandatory Housing Affordability law; guaranteeing paid leave for City of Seattle employees who are mourning the death of a child; and passing new rules allowing council members to call in to meetings so that if they are elsewhere (or on leave) during an important vote, they can still participate.

Still, Mosqueda and González say there’s a lot to be done to make Seattle more mom- and family-friendly, both at City Hall—where the lone breastfeeding facility is still tucked away in a dank, smelly corner of the basement—and in the city as a whole, where even unsubsidized child care is scarce. “The fact is that we have not invested enough in opportunities to have child care, and we haven’t invested in the pipeline to support the people, primarily women, who work as child-care workers throughout the state” and often make less than $15 an hour, says González, who—like Mosqueda—is on waiting lists for child care. She says she’d like to look at city-level subsidies and incentives not just for preschool, which gets funding through the Families and Education Levy, but for infant care, which is both scarcer and more expensive.

In April, Mosqueda asked Mayor Jenny Durkan to look at options for opening a child-care center on the first floor of City Hall by 2020, so that city workers (and people working at nearby office buildings) could have access to child care close to work, instead of having to rush across town to beat late-pickup fees. In response, the city’s Department of Education and Early Learning (DEEL) came back with a schedule that shows an opening date of 2022, which Mosqueda describes as “shocking. There should be no excuse when we are currently housing empty chairs, empty desks and bookshelves in a room that has floor-to-ceiling windows, is on the first floor and [is] accessible.” Asked about the discrepancy between Mosqueda’s preferred opening date and DEEL’s schedule, Durkan spokeswoman Chelsea Kellogg says, “Mayor Durkan will continue to work with Councilmember Mosqueda and community members to get a childcare facility at or near City Hall that would benefit the public as quickly as possible.”

Mosqueda says she’s been criticized for focusing on things like child care now that she’s pregnant. “I’ve been working on childcare for [nearly] 15 years. I have not been pregnant for 15 years,” she says. “And I can also talk about my lived experience. I think it makes us better legislators.”

The demographics of the council have shifted in recent years, skewing both younger and with more females than in the past—a sign, perhaps, that Mosqueda and González won’t be the only new moms on the council for long. On the other hand, as Johnson points out, the 55 people who ran for the City Council this year included only a handful of parents with infants or toddlers, and none of those candidates made it through the primary.

Johnson says that when he decided to leave the council, he tried to recruit young women to run, but heard the same thing again and again: “They told me that they saw how hard it was for me to have young children while on the council and they said, ‘Why would I put myself through what you just went through?’ I didn’t have an answer, except that when I was on council, all the women were tougher than I was,” he says.

Wills, whose two children are now in their teens, says “working moms” don’t just contribute to a more diverse council, their presence also leads to better policies. “It’s a huge missing perspective that I think needs to be corrected, and that can only be done by electing more working moms to the council,” she says.

Related Content

The proposed ordinance would impose a fine of $250 a day on anyone who “allows” another person to live in a derelict vehicle, among other fees

Seattle’s unique Democracy Voucher Program was designed to increase the number and diversity of local candidates. Is it doing the job?

Seattle’s unique Democracy Voucher Program was designed to increase the number and diversity of local candidates. Is it doing the job?

The new legislation makes several statewide reforms