Gender Wage Gap Wider in King County Than Elsewhere in Washington State

Although pay equity for women has improved, men are still paid more for the same work. Why is the problem even worse in King County than elsewhere?
Women in King County earn 76¢ for every dollar earned by men, compared with 78¢ for Washington state as a whole

In 2015, Katie Moussouris filed a gender discrimination class action lawsuit against her former employer, Microsoft, accusing the tech giant of discriminating against women in technical roles with respect to pay and promotion. A month later, two more employees, Holly Muenchow and Dana Piermarini, were added as plaintiffs. The women claimed that their male colleagues were being promoted at a faster rate, despite being less qualified in some instances.

While Microsoft has denied the allegations in the ongoing case, the lawsuit sheds light on a decades-old issue that’s back in the news both locally and nationally: the gender wage gap. 

Disturbingly, this gap is wider in King County than elsewhere. Reports by several women’s advocacy groups show that women here who work full time earn 76 cents for every dollar earned by men, compared with 78 cents for the state as a whole. If King County were a state, its wage gap would be worse than 41 other states. One report showed that the Seattle/Tacoma/Bellevue region—which boasts powerhouse employers Microsoft, Boeing, Amazon and Starbucks—fell dead last in a ranking of 50 large U.S. metropolitan regions in terms of pay disparity.

This wage disparity quickly adds up. Over the course of a year, a woman working full time in King County earns an estimated $16,000 less annually than a man, according to the 2015 “Status of Women in Washington” report produced by Washington nonprofit Women’s Funding Alliance (WFA). Over the course of a 40-year career, that adds up to $544,000 less. The report shows that women of color are even more severely affected. 

These statistics are a few years old, but the numbers still hold fairly true, says Liz Vivian, WFA president and CEO. WFA is in the middle of conducting research for a new four-county regional report, and so far, “we haven’t seen radical changes that it’s different today,” says Vivian.

So why does our seemingly progressive and affluent region take last place in income equity? It helps to understand the makeup of metropolitan areas in general, the economic drivers of our region specifically and the cultural expectations that have long guided women’s career choices. 

While metropolitan areas like Seattle typically have a highly educated set of women drawn by abundant job opportunities, the Pacific Northwest has historically been built on male-dominated, high-paying, economy-driven industries such as aerospace, maritime, forestry and other natural resources. More recently, economy-driving fields, such as high tech and construction, have been added to the mix, which—again—are highly paid and tend to be male-dominated. 

Why educated women don’t simply enter these high-paying fields is at the crux of the gender equity debate. “The choices we make are driven by cultural influence, family, education and race so much that they override what anyone might perceive as personal self-interest,” says Vivian.

A University of Washington study published in the October edition of the American Psychological Association’s Psychological Bulletin explored why women are underrepresented in some STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) fields. The study found three factors most likely to explain gendered patterns: a lack of precollege experience, gender gaps in belief about one’s abilities and a masculine culture that discourages women from participating.

WFA’s status report showed that women are more strongly represented in less lucrative fields, such as sales and service occupations. The existence of this more segregated workforce is why we have such a wide gender wage gap.

“That is changing,” says Vivian. “There are more women in construction today than decades ago, more in high tech, more at the Port [of Seattle], more in Boeing management.” The gap is closing, says Vivian, but slowly. 

In fact, a calculation by the Washington, D.C.–based Institute for Women’s Policy Research, using census and community survey information, concludes that at the current rate of progress, the gender wage gap in Washington state won’t close until 2071. This means a girl who is 10 years old today will be close to retirement age before she’ll be paid the same wage as her male counterpart.

Closing the gap has implications beyond simple equity. There are also benefits to Washington’s economy. For example, if married working women in Washington ages 18 and older were paid the same as men in comparable positions, their average annual earnings would increase from $40,250 to $47,582, or 18.2 percent, according to the WFA report. This translates into an average of $7,332 per year for each family, which would raise the average annual income for married couples from $114,468 to $122,098.

When the national Partnership for Women & Families reported back in 2013 that the Seattle metropolitan area ranked so dismally on the gender pay inequity, Seattle leaders took notice. Then Mayor Mike McGinn, WFA’s Vivian, Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce CEO Maud Daudon and even Senator Patty Murray amped up efforts to address the problem.

One effort that took hold was 100% Talent—a joint initiative led by the chamber and WFA. Launched in 2015, its goal is to get businesses in the Greater Seattle area involved in addressing the gender wage gap issue.

Modeled after a similar initiative in Boston, 100% Talent offers 31 “best practice” ideas for companies to consider, ranging from “reorient workplace culture to emphasize results over ‘seat time’” and “enlist diverse evaluators in hiring” to “offer paid family leave” and “include women on senior search committees.”

“We included so many [ideas] because we think it’s important for every organization to feel some agency around this issue,” says Emma Mayberry, director of 100% Talent. “Every business will be different, but we argue that everyone can find something they can do to tackle the issue.”

Businesses are asked to pick three items from the list and figure out how to implement them or, if they’re already in practice, do them better. Company representatives meet in a roundtable workshop quarterly to compare notes and share successes.

The five-year goal of the initiative is to sign up 500 companies in the Puget Sound area. A year into the program, 20 are on board, including Amazon, Microsoft, Moss Adams, Alaska Airlines, T-Mobile, Deloitte, Ben Bridge, Bank of America and Point B. Organizers are now focusing on bringing small and medium-size companies into the fold.

A report on the success of the initiative to date is still in the works, and will be shared at a wage gap summit in Seattle in May. Mayberry says enthusiasm among participants is high.

“The folks who have shown up are really hungry for these ideas,” she says. “They’re excited about this initiative and excited to work on making a concrete change in their organizations.”

The 100% Talent program is one of several women-focused programs led by Women’s Funding Alliance. Others include the Girls’ Leadership Organizations of Washington (GLOW) Initiative, Campus New and Thrive—all with the common goal of supporting females in the community and in the workplace, and paying women the same as men for the same work. 

If these programs are successful, perhaps today’s 10-year-old girls won’t have to wait until they retire before they earn the same as their male counterparts. 

Related Content


What Every High School Parent and Student Should Know

A note from the editor

A note from the editor

The West Seattle Bridge may not be open until 2021; the Farmers Markets are starting to come back, and the Tulip festival would like you to stay home, please. All the news you missed in between reading about coronavirus.

"There’s no pride in doing the bare minimum, and there’s no pride in standing in the center when there are two clear sides: life or death.”